PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. ACSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSUS vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSUS vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
-4.08%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
-3.00%10.70%22.51%21.06%-20.93%23.33%44.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's -3.00% return.


GSUS

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-4.08%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*

ACSI

1D
0.30%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-3.00%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSUS vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUSACSIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.60

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

0.97

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.99

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

3.99

+3.14

GSUS vs. ACSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the ACSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and ACSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUSACSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.60

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.46

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.68

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and ACSI is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSUS vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than ACSI's 0.94% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
1.13%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.94%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and ACSI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSACSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-34.49%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-9.91%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-24.86%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-5.38%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-5.47%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.46%

+0.17%

Volatility

GSUS vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 4.75%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSUSACSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.75%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

8.55%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

15.66%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

16.65%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.49%

-0.29%