PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUIX vs. BGNMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX) and American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUIX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than BGNMX's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GSUIX has outperformed BGNMX with an annualized return of 1.19%, while BGNMX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.


GSUIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
1.19%

BGNMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.73%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSUIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund
0.52%8.31%0.61%4.51%-13.09%-1.35%5.79%6.39%0.72%1.82%
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
0.74%7.43%0.52%4.72%-12.06%-1.79%3.73%6.17%0.44%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUIX and BGNMX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.87

The correlation between GSUIX and BGNMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUIX vs. BGNMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUIX
GSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BGNMX
BGNMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BGNMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGNMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGNMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BGNMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGNMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX) and American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUIXBGNMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.04

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

6.89

-0.03

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BGNMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUIX and BGNMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUIXBGNMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.18

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.94

-0.26

Drawdowns

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUIX drawdown since its inception was -19.29%, roughly equal to the maximum BGNMX drawdown of -18.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUIX and BGNMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUIXBGNMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.29%

-18.46%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-3.07%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.75%

-7.78%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-17.74%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.29%

-18.46%

-0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.61%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-2.03%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.91%

+0.07%

Volatility

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX) and American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) have volatilities of 1.60% and 1.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUIXBGNMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.66%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

3.01%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

4.08%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.60%

6.45%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

4.84%

+0.19%

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BGNMX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSUIX vs. BGNMX - Dividend Comparison

GSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than BGNMX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
3.94%3.86%3.70%3.21%1.90%1.64%2.16%2.68%2.65%2.37%2.37%2.37%
GSUIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund
4.02%4.01%3.45%3.14%1.87%1.67%2.88%3.26%2.94%2.58%2.65%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GSUIX and BGNMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BGNMX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to GSUIX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUIX dropped -19.29% vs BGNMX's -18.46%.

GSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUIX and BGNMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer