PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGNMX vs. FBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGNMX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than FBLTX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BGNMX has outperformed FBLTX with an annualized return of 0.88%, while FBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.68% annualized return.


BGNMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.73%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
0.88%

FBLTX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
-6.17%
10Y*
-1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
0.74%7.43%0.52%4.72%-12.06%-1.79%3.73%6.17%0.44%1.22%
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.08%4.39%-8.05%2.71%-31.84%-4.89%18.27%14.36%-1.24%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BGNMX and FBLTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2015

0.73

The correlation between BGNMX and FBLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGNMX vs. FBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGNMX
BGNMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BGNMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGNMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGNMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BGNMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGNMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLTX
FBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGNMXFBLTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

0.53

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

0.82

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

0.67

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.89

1.71

+5.18

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGNMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the FBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGNMX and FBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGNMXFBLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.53

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.39

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

-0.12

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

-0.05

+1.00

Drawdowns

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGNMX drawdown since its inception was -18.46%, smaller than the maximum FBLTX drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGNMX and FBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGNMXFBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.46%

-49.06%

+30.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-7.66%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-19.12%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-44.19%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.46%

-49.06%

+30.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-41.01%

+39.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-20.99%

+18.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

3.01%

-2.10%

Volatility

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) is 1.66%, while Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that BGNMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGNMXFBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.80%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

6.56%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

9.82%

-5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

15.70%

-9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

14.59%

-9.75%

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGNMX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLTX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGNMX vs. FBLTX - Dividend Comparison

BGNMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than FBLTX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
3.94%3.86%3.70%3.21%1.90%1.64%2.16%2.68%2.65%2.37%2.37%2.37%
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.17%4.04%3.60%3.29%2.25%1.81%6.73%2.39%2.87%2.68%3.70%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGNMX and FBLTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLTX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to BGNMX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGNMX dropped -18.46% vs FBLTX's -49.06%.

BGNMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGNMX and FBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer