GSUI vs. FLDR
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
GSUI vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -44.62% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.83% return.
GSUI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -60.24%
- YTD
- -44.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -44.62% | -42.99% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.83% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and FLDR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLDR
GSUI vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 64.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -12.23% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.43% | -0.03% | -68.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -0.35% | -53.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.20% | 0.80% | +101.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.20% | 1.21% | +100.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.20% | 5.23% | +96.97% |
GSUI vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUI vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and FLDR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.15% for FLDR.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer