GSUI vs. FLDR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while FLDR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.

Performance

GSUI vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -39.93% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.44% return.

GSUI

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -12.82%
• YTD: -39.93%
• 6M: -46.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUI vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF	-39.93%	-34.63%
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	1.44%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUI and FLDR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

GSUI vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR

FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUI vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSUI	FLDR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	3.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	0.62	-1.39

Drawdowns

GSUI vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -60.73%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and FLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSUI	FLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.73%	-12.23%	-48.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.73%	-0.02%	-60.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.81%	-0.35%	-43.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSUI	FLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	107.79%	0.80%	+106.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.79%	1.21%	+106.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.79%	5.26%	+102.53%

GSUI vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSUI vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	4.43%	4.66%	5.50%	5.28%	2.09%	0.51%	1.22%	2.69%	1.38%
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSUI and FLDR in my portfolio?

GSUI and FLDR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSUI or FLDR?

On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSUI or FLDR?

GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSUI or FLDR?

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.

What is the main difference between GSUI and FLDR?

GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLDR is Corporate Bonds. GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.15% for FLDR.