GSUI vs. ETHA
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GSUI tracks the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate while ETHA tracks the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ETHA.
Performance
GSUI vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUI having a -39.93% return and ETHA slightly higher at -39.46%.
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -23.58%
- YTD
- -39.46%
- 6M
- -42.75%
- 1Y
- -31.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.93% | -34.63% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.46% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and ETHA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
ETHA
GSUI vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUI | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | -0.41 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -60.73%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and ETHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.73% | -64.02% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.73% | -62.89% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -32.65% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.73% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.79% | 68.61% | +39.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.79% | 72.53% | +35.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.79% | 72.53% | +35.26% |
GSUI vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUI vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSUI nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and ETHA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.
GSUI and ETHA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.25% for ETHA.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and ETHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer