PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSMX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 11.22%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


GSSMX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.52%
YTD
14.80%
6M
14.12%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.22%

GCGIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.96%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
14.80%10.65%36.03%11.18%-15.00%26.15%1.65%22.75%-14.37%11.85%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
6.18%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSMX and GCGIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 1997

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between GSSMX and GCGIX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSMX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSMX
GSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSMXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

1.59

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

2.17

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.44

+1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.05

4.71

+6.34

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSMX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSMXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.59

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.76

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.84

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.46

-0.03

Drawdowns

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSMXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.94%

-65.78%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-17.25%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-25.10%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

-32.57%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-32.94%

-13.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.31%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-20.82%

+10.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

5.25%

-2.18%

Volatility

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) at 3.25%. This indicates that GSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSMXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

3.25%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

11.81%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

15.66%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

22.23%

+10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

21.55%

+7.30%

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSMX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.57%, more than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.06%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
19.57%22.47%47.63%4.49%20.33%22.93%0.19%4.63%13.73%11.34%3.52%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSMX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSSMX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to GCGIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSMX dropped -54.94% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GSSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSMX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer