GSSMX vs. RGAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX).
GSSMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 22, 1992. RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSMX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund | 4.05% | 10.65% | 36.03% | 11.18% | -15.00% | 26.15% | 1.65% | 22.75% | -14.37% | 11.85% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | -7.99% | 20.08% | 28.41% | 37.66% | -30.53% | 19.67% | 38.30% | 29.22% | -2.88% | 26.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's -7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.
GSSMX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
RGAGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSSMX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank
GSSMX
RGAGX
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSMX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.86 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.37 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 4.90 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSMX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.86 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.46 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.75 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSMX and RGAGX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison
GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.60%, more than RGAGX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSMX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund | 21.60% | 22.47% | 47.63% | 4.49% | 20.33% | 22.93% | 0.19% | 4.63% | 13.73% | 11.34% | 3.52% | 5.49% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 11.95% | 10.99% | 9.29% | 7.70% | 4.44% | 8.49% | 4.57% | 7.93% | 12.36% | 7.34% | 6.95% | 9.22% |
Drawdowns
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and RGAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSMX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.94% | -36.19% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.27% | -13.71% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.28% | -36.19% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | -36.19% | -9.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -10.64% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -5.53% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.62% | +0.26% |
Volatility
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSSMX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 6.74% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 12.12% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 21.00% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 20.23% | +12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 19.64% | +9.17% |