PortfoliosLab logo
GSSMX vs. RGAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GSSMX and RGAGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSSMX:

0.07

RGAGX:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

GSSMX:

0.25

RGAGX:

0.57

Omega Ratio

GSSMX:

1.03

RGAGX:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

GSSMX:

0.05

RGAGX:

0.30

Martin Ratio

GSSMX:

0.14

RGAGX:

0.84

Ulcer Index

GSSMX:

9.14%

RGAGX:

9.31%

Daily Std Dev

GSSMX:

23.95%

RGAGX:

25.29%

Max Drawdown

GSSMX:

-55.11%

RGAGX:

-41.74%

Current Drawdown

GSSMX:

-13.71%

RGAGX:

-9.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a -4.90% return, which is significantly lower than RGAGX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 5.17%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.21% annualized return.


GSSMX

YTD

-4.90%

1M

5.37%

6M

-13.21%

1Y

1.60%

3Y*

1.69%

5Y*

10.76%

10Y*

5.17%

RGAGX

YTD

3.39%

1M

8.38%

6M

-6.32%

1Y

9.74%

3Y*

11.20%

5Y*

8.50%

10Y*

6.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSSMX vs. RGAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSSMX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSSMX is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSSMX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSSMX is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSSMX is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSSMX is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RGAGX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RGAGX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RGAGX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RGAGX is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RGAGX is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RGAGX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSMX and RGAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.78%, more than RGAGX's 8.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
25.78%24.51%4.49%20.33%22.93%0.19%4.63%13.73%11.34%3.52%5.49%8.53%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
8.98%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.47%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%10.25%

Drawdowns

GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and RGAGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) at 5.46%. This indicates that GSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...