GSSMX vs. RGAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX).
GSSMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 22, 1992. RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSSMX or RGAGX.
Correlation
The correlation between GSSMX and RGAGX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSSMX:
-0.26
RGAGX:
0.92
GSSMX:
-0.16
RGAGX:
1.18
GSSMX:
0.97
RGAGX:
1.20
GSSMX:
-0.14
RGAGX:
0.91
GSSMX:
-0.66
RGAGX:
3.97
GSSMX:
10.51%
RGAGX:
4.37%
GSSMX:
26.54%
RGAGX:
18.88%
GSSMX:
-63.30%
RGAGX:
-41.74%
GSSMX:
-46.22%
RGAGX:
-7.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than RGAGX's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of -3.66%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.72% annualized return.
GSSMX
2.67%
-1.88%
-13.14%
-6.42%
-6.05%
-3.66%
RGAGX
5.61%
0.96%
6.02%
18.44%
8.40%
6.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSSMX vs. RGAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSSMX
RGAGX
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison
GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than RGAGX's 0.69% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSMX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund | 1.36% | 1.39% | 0.76% | 0.47% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.52% | 0.04% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.33% | 0.19% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 0.72% | 0.40% | 0.53% | 1.26% | 1.09% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 10.99% |
Drawdowns
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -63.30%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and RGAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSSMX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 3.62% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.