PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSC vs. MMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSC vs. MMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 20.74% return, which is significantly higher than MMSC's 15.96% return.


GSSC

1D
1.91%
1M
0.62%
6M
14.82%
YTD
20.74%
1Y
36.16%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.74%

MMSC

1D
1.79%
1M
-2.89%
6M
9.40%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.32M$3.92M$3.01M
$113.97K$132.36K$136.25K

GSSC vs. MMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
20.74%10.76%11.14%17.27%-16.81%3.68%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
15.96%15.45%22.19%18.76%-30.98%1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSC and MMSC is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2021

0.89

The correlation between GSSC and MMSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSSC vs. MMSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSSC
MMSC

Healthcare

21.1%
20.8%

Financial Services

17.0%
8.2%

Technology

15.6%
22.2%

Industrials

13.2%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.6%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.5%

Energy

5.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.6%
1.0%

Utilities

2.2%
0.5%

Healthcare

GSSC
21.1%
MMSC
20.8%

Financial Services

GSSC
17.0%
MMSC
8.2%

Technology

GSSC
15.6%
MMSC
22.2%

Industrials

GSSC
13.2%
MMSC
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GSSC
10.4%
MMSC
10.6%

Real Estate

GSSC
5.2%
MMSC
0.5%

Energy

GSSC
5.1%
MMSC
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

GSSC
4.0%
MMSC
1.9%

Basic Materials

GSSC
3.7%
MMSC
3.4%

Communication Services

GSSC
2.6%
MMSC
1.0%

Utilities

GSSC
2.2%
MMSC
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSC vs. MMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSSC
GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSSC vs. MMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSSCMMSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.43

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

8.40

+3.24

GSSC vs. MMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the MMSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSC and MMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSSC vs. MMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, roughly equal to the maximum MMSC drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and MMSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSCMMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-40.82%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-14.10%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-29.76%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-6.06%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-18.25%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.08%

-0.97%

Volatility

GSSC vs. MMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is 4.21%, while First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that GSSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSCMMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

6.44%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

18.85%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

24.16%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

24.53%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

24.53%

-1.62%

GSSC vs. MMSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MMSC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSC vs. MMSC - Dividend Comparison

GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.17%1.42%1.33%1.31%1.00%0.94%1.24%1.21%0.73%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSC and MMSC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMSC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to GSSC (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs MMSC's -40.82%.

On 3-year performance, MMSC leads with 19.72% vs 16.16% for GSSC. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MMSC has performed better with a 19.72% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.

GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.95% for MMSC.

GSSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSC and MMSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer