GSSC vs. CSHP
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GSSC is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GSSC returned 36.17% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
GSSC vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.86% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 18.44%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSSC vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.44% | 10.76% | 0.36% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.86% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and CSHP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.02 |
The correlation between GSSC and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
CSHP
GSSC vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSSC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 6.67 | -5.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 65.84 | -62.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 395.75 | -384.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -0.08% | -41.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -0.06% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -0.00% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 0.01% | +3.14% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 0.15% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 0.27% | +13.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 0.36% | +18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 0.41% | +20.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 0.41% | +22.60% |
GSSC vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GSSC and CSHP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSSC and CSHP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSSC has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, GSSC leads with 36.17% vs 3.96% for CSHP. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 36.17% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSSC and CSHP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.03% for GSSC.
GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer