PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPKX vs. GUIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GSPKX has outperformed GUIRX with an annualized return of 13.06%, while GUIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.


GSPKX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.77%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.93%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
13.06%

GUIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.45%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.70%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%7.80%3.09%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPKX and GUIRX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between GSPKX and GUIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPKX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSPKXGUIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.70

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.66

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

9.33

+7.34

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the GUIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPKX and GUIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSPKXGUIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.70

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.36

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.10

-0.56

Drawdowns

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, which is greater than GUIRX's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and GUIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPKXGUIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-14.21%

-37.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-2.46%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-5.33%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-14.16%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-14.21%

-18.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-2.12%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.70%

+0.83%

Volatility

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that GSPKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPKXGUIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

0.91%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

1.83%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

2.44%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

3.70%

+12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

3.94%

+12.96%

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPKX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison

GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than GUIRX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
5.98%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPKX and GUIRX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSPKX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to GUIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs GUIRX's -14.21%.

GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPKX and GUIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer