GSPKX vs. GLPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSPKX (Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund) and GLPIX (Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - GSPKX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GLPIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GSPKX returned 13.06%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for GLPIX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSPKX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GLPIX.

Performance

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than GLPIX's 17.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GSPKX has outperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 13.06%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.

GSPKX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 24.89%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 13.20%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

GLPIX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 17.79%
• 6M: 17.05%
• 1Y: 18.66%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund	10.45%	13.60%	29.55%	21.39%	-15.20%	22.79%	14.15%	25.11%	-6.29%	15.32%
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	17.79%	4.45%	28.00%	19.67%	26.06%	39.89%	-31.08%	7.04%	-14.57%	-5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPKX and GLPIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between GSPKX and GLPIX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GSPKX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPKX

GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

GLPIX

GLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSPKX	GLPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.76	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.42	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.30	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.15	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.67	9.30	+7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the GLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPKX and GLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSPKX	GLPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.76	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.99	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.32	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.19	+0.35

Drawdowns

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and GLPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSPKX	GLPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.90%	-75.98%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-6.43%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.51%	-13.96%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.34%	-20.89%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.70%	-70.48%	+37.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.23%	+4.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-23.14%	+17.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	2.17%	-0.64%

Volatility

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) is 1.99%, while Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that GSPKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSPKX	GLPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	4.82%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	8.64%	-0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	11.53%	-1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	19.13%	-3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	25.91%	-9.01%

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSPKX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison

GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than GLPIX's 6.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund	6.36%	7.03%	6.60%	6.70%	6.00%	6.26%	9.72%	8.67%	8.02%	7.49%	11.46%	6.62%
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund	5.98%	6.32%	12.77%	6.48%	6.33%	6.01%	7.19%	6.86%	7.95%	6.13%	5.63%	6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSPKX and GLPIX in my portfolio?

GSPKX and GLPIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSPKX or GLPIX?

GLPIX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to GSPKX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs GLPIX's -75.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.