PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPAX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPAX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GSPAX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 12.69%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


GSPAX

1D
0.15%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.39%
6M
10.76%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
20.59%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.69%

GCGIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.96%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPAX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A
10.39%13.27%29.10%21.09%-15.36%22.39%13.66%24.67%-6.63%14.84%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
6.18%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPAX and GCGIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.92

The correlation between GSPAX and GCGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPAX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPAX
GSPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GSPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSPAXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.28

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.44

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.15

4.71

+11.44

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPAX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSPAXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.59

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.76

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.46

+0.06

Drawdowns

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPAX drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPAX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPAXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.07%

-65.78%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-17.25%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-25.10%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-32.57%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-32.94%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-20.82%

+14.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

5.25%

-3.69%

Volatility

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) is 1.98%, while Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that GSPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPAXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.25%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

11.81%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

15.66%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

22.23%

-6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

21.55%

-4.66%

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPAX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GSPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.06%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GSPAX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A
5.68%6.05%12.41%6.14%6.12%5.67%6.81%6.47%7.50%5.73%5.25%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GSPAX and GCGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCGIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to GSPAX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPAX dropped -52.07% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GSPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPAX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer