GSPAX vs. AMINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX).
GSPAX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 31, 2010. AMINX is an actively managed fund by Amana. It was launched on Sep 25, 2013.
Performance
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPAX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A | -6.05% | 13.27% | 29.10% | 21.09% | -15.36% | 22.39% | 13.66% | 24.67% | -6.63% | 14.84% |
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class | -4.76% | 16.69% | 13.13% | 13.87% | -8.65% | 22.81% | 14.18% | 25.59% | -4.94% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSPAX achieves a -6.05% return, which is significantly lower than AMINX's -4.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSPAX having a 11.04% annualized return and AMINX not far behind at 10.80%.
GSPAX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 6M
- -3.16%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
AMINX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSPAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AMINX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSPAX vs. AMINX — Risk / Return Rank
GSPAX
AMINX
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSPAX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.83 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.28 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.06 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 4.31 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSPAX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.83 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.68 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSPAX and AMINX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Dividend Comparison
GSPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than AMINX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPAX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A | 6.67% | 6.05% | 12.41% | 6.14% | 6.12% | 5.67% | 6.81% | 6.47% | 7.50% | 5.73% | 5.25% | 5.86% |
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class | 6.09% | 5.80% | 6.06% | 5.61% | 8.61% | 5.02% | 6.91% | 8.22% | 6.87% | 6.04% | 4.58% | 7.18% |
Drawdowns
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSPAX drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, which is greater than AMINX's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPAX and AMINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSPAX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -31.45% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -11.00% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -19.04% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | -31.45% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.92% | -11.00% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -3.66% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.72% | -0.28% |
Volatility
GSPAX vs. AMINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) is 3.95%, while Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that GSPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSPAX | AMINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.57% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 9.23% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 15.68% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 13.75% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.86% | +1.00% |