GSPAX vs. AMINX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSPAX (Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A) and AMINX (Amana Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSPAX returned 12.72%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for AMINX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSPAX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for AMINX.

Performance

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPAX achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMINX's 12.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSPAX having a 12.72% annualized return and AMINX not far behind at 12.46%.

GSPAX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 23.95%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

AMINX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.06%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 11.88%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSPAX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A	10.00%	13.27%	29.10%	21.09%	-15.36%	22.39%	13.66%	24.67%	-6.63%	14.84%
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	12.01%	16.69%	13.13%	13.87%	-8.65%	22.81%	14.18%	25.59%	-4.94%	21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPAX and AMINX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.87

The correlation between GSPAX and AMINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSPAX vs. AMINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPAX

GSPAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GSPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GSPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GSPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GSPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GSPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

AMINX

AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 41
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSPAX	AMINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.78	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.57	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.32	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	2.09	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.95	8.22	+6.72

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the AMINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPAX and AMINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPAX drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, which is greater than AMINX's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPAX and AMINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSPAX	AMINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.07%	-31.45%	-20.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-11.00%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.51%	-15.34%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-19.04%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.71%	-31.45%	-1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-3.63%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.79%	-1.20%

Volatility

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A (GSPAX) is 3.54%, while Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that GSPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSPAX	AMINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	4.67%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	10.57%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	12.91%	-2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	14.01%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	15.99%	+0.92%

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AMINX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSPAX vs. AMINX - Dividend Comparison

GSPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than AMINX's 5.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	5.20%	5.80%	6.06%	5.61%	8.61%	5.02%	6.91%	8.22%	6.87%	6.04%	4.58%	7.18%
GSPAX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A	5.70%	6.05%	12.41%	6.14%	6.12%	5.67%	6.81%	6.47%	7.50%	5.73%	5.25%	5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSPAX and AMINX in my portfolio?

GSPAX and AMINX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSPAX or AMINX?

AMINX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to GSPAX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPAX dropped -52.07% vs AMINX's -31.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.