PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSOL vs. CBXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSOL vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSOL

1D
-4.43%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBXO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSOL vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GSOL and CBXO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSOL vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSOL vs. CBXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSOLCBXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.23

-2.36

+0.12

Drawdowns

GSOL vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSOL drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSOL and CBXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSOLCBXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-11.40%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-11.40%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-8.46%

+2.93%

Volatility

GSOL vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSOLCBXODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.66%

7.23%

+44.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.66%

7.23%

+44.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.66%

7.23%

+44.43%

GSOL vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSOL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSOL vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison

GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GSOL and CBXO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.

GSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSOL and 0.69% for CBXO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSOL and CBXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer