PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSOL vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSOL vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSOL

1D
-4.08%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSOL vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GSOL and BFOC is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSOL vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSOL vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSOLBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.47

-1.87

-0.60

Drawdowns

GSOL vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSOL drawdown since its inception was -15.93%, smaller than the maximum BFOC drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSOL and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSOLBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.93%

-18.20%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.93%

-18.20%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-12.55%

+4.94%

Volatility

GSOL vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSOLBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.17%

12.57%

+32.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.17%

12.57%

+32.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.17%

12.57%

+32.60%

GSOL vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSOL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSOL vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSOL nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GSOL and BFOC have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

GSOL and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSOL and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSOL and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer