GSOL vs. BCDF
GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSOL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
GSOL vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSOL
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -12.36% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | -3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSOL and BCDF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSOL vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
GSOL
BCDF
GSOL vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSOL | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -2.23 | 0.39 | -2.63 |
Drawdowns
GSOL vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSOL drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSOL and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSOL | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -27.70% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -7.63% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -9.83% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility
GSOL vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSOL | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.66% | 14.76% | +36.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.66% | 16.94% | +34.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.66% | 16.94% | +34.72% |
GSOL vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSOL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSOL vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.45% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSOL and BCDF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSOL and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for GSOL and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer