PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSMYX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than SSMHX's 14.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSMYX having a 11.63% annualized return and SSMHX not far ahead at 11.85%.


GSMYX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.56%
YTD
17.82%
6M
15.57%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
11.63%

SSMHX

1D
1.13%
1M
3.17%
YTD
14.33%
6M
12.88%
1Y
29.92%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
17.82%2.15%12.88%14.28%-28.45%7.93%53.14%38.25%-5.63%28.22%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
14.33%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%32.46%28.00%-9.21%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and SSMHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.93

The correlation between GSMYX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMYX
GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSMYXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.00

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

10.91

-1.29

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMYX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSMYXSSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.78

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.28

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.48

0.00

Drawdowns

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSMYXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-41.61%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-10.03%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.90%

-30.38%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.51%

-34.84%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.51%

-41.61%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-9.14%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.76%

+0.22%

Volatility

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) at 4.81%. This indicates that GSMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSMYXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

4.81%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

12.42%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

16.92%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.65%

22.42%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

22.38%

+0.33%

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSMYX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.37%, more than SSMHX's 6.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.37%15.76%0.67%0.00%0.00%14.07%13.51%14.27%20.82%12.92%3.50%3.62%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.23%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GSMYX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSMYX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SSMHX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSMYX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer