PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSMYX vs. PMEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund (PMEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than PMEGX's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX has outperformed PMEGX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while PMEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.


GSMYX

1D
3.00%
1M
-5.82%
6M
10.39%
YTD
13.73%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
11.11%
ALL TIME*
10.67%

PMEGX

1D
0.47%
1M
-1.53%
6M
2.67%
YTD
3.03%
1Y
6.19%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
9.78%
ALL TIME*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.73%2.15%12.88%14.28%-28.45%7.93%53.14%38.25%-5.63%28.22%
PMEGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund
3.03%3.73%9.15%20.69%-23.19%15.50%23.95%33.08%-2.23%26.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and PMEGX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.94

The correlation between GSMYX and PMEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. PMEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSMYX
GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PMEGX
PMEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PMEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PMEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund (PMEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSMYXPMEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.06

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

0.41

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

1.39

+3.95

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the PMEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMYX and PMEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, roughly equal to the maximum PMEGX drawdown of -55.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and PMEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSMYXPMEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-55.88%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-10.21%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.90%

-27.99%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.51%

-32.87%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.51%

-37.16%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.90%

-6.20%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-8.99%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.04%

+0.54%

Volatility

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund (PMEGX) at 2.50%. This indicates that GSMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSMYXPMEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

2.50%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

10.49%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

13.64%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.97%

20.11%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

19.75%

+3.07%

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PMEGX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSMYX vs. PMEGX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, less than PMEGX's 20.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.86%15.76%0.67%0.00%0.00%14.07%13.51%14.27%20.82%12.92%3.50%3.62%
PMEGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund
20.48%21.10%14.15%7.07%1.65%12.80%4.44%5.11%10.42%6.30%1.04%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSMYX and PMEGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSMYX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to PMEGX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs PMEGX's -55.88%.

GSMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSMYX and PMEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer