GSMYX vs. NEEIX
GSMYX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NEEIX (Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GSMYX returned 1.31%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for NEEIX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSMYX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for NEEIX.
Performance
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than NEEIX's 34.81% return.
GSMYX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 22.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
NEEIX
- 1D
- 5.86%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- YTD
- 34.81%
- 1Y
- 52.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.73% | 2.15% | 12.88% | 14.28% | -28.45% | 7.93% | 53.14% | 38.25% | -5.63% | 28.22% |
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class | 34.81% | 9.32% | 19.26% | 27.30% | -33.26% | 28.13% | 42.39% | 43.15% | -10.13% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSMYX and NEEIX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GSMYX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSMYX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSMYX
NEEIX
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSMYX | NEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.03 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 8.46 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than NEEIX's maximum drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and NEEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSMYX | NEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -43.11% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -23.12% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.90% | -36.13% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.51% | -43.11% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.90% | -18.62% | +9.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -10.82% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 5.66% | -2.08% |
Volatility
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) is 6.57%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that GSMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSMYX | NEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 12.98% | -6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 26.84% | -8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 32.46% | -10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 29.43% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 26.32% | -3.50% |
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSMYX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison
GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than NEEIX's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.86% | 15.76% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.07% | 13.51% | 14.27% | 20.82% | 12.92% | 3.50% | 3.62% |
NEEIX Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class | 5.31% | 7.16% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 1.72% | 6.70% | 5.58% | 11.09% | 17.58% | 9.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSMYX and NEEIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEEIX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to GSMYX (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.
NEEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSMYX and NEEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer