GSMYX vs. GGSIX
GSMYX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and GGSIX (Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio) are both mutual funds - GSMYX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GGSIX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX returned 11.11%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for GGSIX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSMYX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GGSIX.
Performance
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than GGSIX's 8.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSMYX having a 11.11% annualized return and GGSIX not far behind at 10.87%.
GSMYX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 22.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
GGSIX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.73% | 2.15% | 12.88% | 14.28% | -28.45% | 7.93% | 53.14% | 38.25% | -5.63% | 28.22% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 8.55% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSMYX and GGSIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GSMYX and GGSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSMYX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSMYX
GGSIX
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSMYX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.16 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 9.08 | -3.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and GGSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSMYX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -52.85% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -8.71% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.90% | -14.78% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.51% | -26.74% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.51% | -30.36% | -12.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.90% | -1.74% | -7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -9.16% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.06% | +1.52% |
Volatility
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) at 3.55%. This indicates that GSMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSMYX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 3.55% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 9.96% | +8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 12.03% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 13.59% | +10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 14.30% | +8.52% |
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSMYX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than GGSIX's 10.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 10.94% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.86% | 15.76% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.07% | 13.51% | 14.27% | 20.82% | 12.92% | 3.50% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSMYX and GGSIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSMYX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to GGSIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs GGSIX's -52.85%.
GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSMYX and GGSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer