GSMYX vs. BQMGX

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

GSMYX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and BQMGX (Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX returned 12.47%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for BQMGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSMYX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BQMGX.

Performance

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly higher than BQMGX's -1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX has outperformed BQMGX with an annualized return of 12.47%, while BQMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.

GSMYX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 23.11%
• 6M: 21.93%
• 1Y: 31.36%
• 3Y*: 13.38%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

BQMGX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: -1.32%
• 6M: -2.15%
• 1Y: -2.75%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: 8.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	23.11%	2.15%	12.88%	14.28%	-28.45%	7.93%	53.14%	38.25%	-5.63%	28.22%
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund	-1.32%	-0.29%	14.16%	13.00%	-19.44%	23.02%	19.62%	32.05%	-6.68%	22.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and BQMGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between GSMYX and BQMGX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMYX

GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 49
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BQMGX

BQMGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BQMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSMYX	BQMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	-0.17	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	-0.15	+2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.98	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	-0.18	+2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	-0.39	+10.93

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the BQMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMYX and BQMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than BQMGX's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and BQMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSMYX	BQMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.00%	-36.05%	-18.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-11.62%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.90%	-18.72%	-11.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.51%	-25.92%	-16.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.51%	-36.05%	-6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.32%	+7.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.86%	-5.88%	-4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	5.29%	-2.28%

Volatility

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 3.37%. This indicates that GSMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSMYX	BQMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.99%	3.37%	+4.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.69%	9.37%	+8.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.60%	12.28%	+9.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.88%	16.86%	+7.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.75%	17.91%	+4.84%

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BQMGX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSMYX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.80%, more than BQMGX's 4.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.17%	4.12%	5.99%	0.00%	5.90%	8.05%	5.27%	3.50%	0.00%	0.08%	1.07%	5.80%
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	12.80%	15.76%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	14.07%	13.51%	14.27%	20.82%	12.92%	3.50%	3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSMYX and BQMGX in my portfolio?

GSMYX and BQMGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSMYX or BQMGX?

GSMYX has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to BQMGX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs BQMGX's -36.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.