GSMIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GSMIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 19, 1993. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | -0.49% | 4.12% | 3.03% | 6.41% | -9.77% | 2.80% | 3.57% | 7.49% | 2.83% | 5.55% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSMIX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMIX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 2.42%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
GSMIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSMIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSMIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GSMIX
GSIFX
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSMIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.91 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.12 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.81 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 3.23 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSMIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.48 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.30 | +0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSMIX and GSIFX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | 3.52% | 4.32% | 3.31% | 2.82% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.99% | 3.35% | 3.43% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSMIX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSMIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -59.25% | +43.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -12.15% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -31.94% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.33% | -35.00% | +20.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -11.48% | +9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -15.30% | +12.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.06% | -1.81% |
Volatility
GSMIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) is 0.88%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSMIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 6.71% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | 11.13% | -9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.48% | 16.87% | -12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 16.71% | -13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 17.32% | -13.42% |