GSKH vs. TRUH
GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GSKH is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
GSKH vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSKH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- 6M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 39.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.86%
TRUH
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.19K | $35.33K | $34.24K | |
| $27.52K | $33.21K | $25.39K |
GSKH vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | -8.53% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSKH and TRUH is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSKH vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
GSKH
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSKH vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSKH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSKH vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSKH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -4.51% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -1.85% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -1.68% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility
GSKH vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSKH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.07% | 17.43% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 17.43% | +9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 17.43% | +9.51% |
GSKH vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSKH vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.91% | 1.15% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSKH and TRUH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for GSKH.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for GSKH and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer