GSKH vs. PBPH
GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
GSKH vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSKH achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 7.59% return.
GSKH
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 44.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSKH vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 10.65% | 1.25% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 7.59% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSKH and PBPH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSKH vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
GSKH
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSKH vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSKH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSKH vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSKH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -11.10% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.02% | -0.64% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -4.33% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility
GSKH vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSKH | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 17.37% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 17.37% | +9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 17.37% | +9.51% |
GSKH vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSKH vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than PBPH's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.80% | 1.15% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSKH and PBPH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for GSKH.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.08% for PBPH.
GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for GSKH and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer