PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSK vs. GRP.IR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSK is traded in USD, while GRP.IR is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GRP.IR values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSK having a 9.89% return and GRP.IR slightly lower at 9.73%.


GSK

1D
0.34%
1M
4.84%
YTD
9.89%
6M
10.40%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.35%

GRP.IR

1D
-0.11%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
9.73%
6M
7.14%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
-2.44%
5Y*
-2.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
9.89%51.23%-5.14%9.71%-33.41%26.74%-17.72%29.24%13.79%-10.29%
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
9.73%3.73%-18.30%-0.96%-0.05%-5.25%12.62%18.51%-1.71%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GSK and GRP.IR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2017

0.14

The correlation between GSK and GRP.IR shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSK vs. GRP.IR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSK
GSK Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GRP.IR
GRP.IR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSKGRP.IRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.32

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

0.76

+3.16

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSK and GRP.IR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSK drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GRP.IR's maximum drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK and GRP.IR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSKGRP.IRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.70%

-33.00%

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.63%

-12.53%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-25.29%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.10%

-31.61%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.92%

-17.89%

+5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-11.71%

-7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

5.23%

+3.05%

Volatility

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) is 6.81%, while Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that GSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRP.IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSKGRP.IRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

8.51%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

17.08%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

20.59%

+6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

20.24%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

22.04%

+0.85%

Dividends

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Dividend Comparison

GSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than GRP.IR's 9.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
9.33%9.89%8.09%6.24%5.44%5.41%5.22%5.10%6.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
3.26%3.42%4.60%3.75%5.47%4.99%5.59%4.35%5.65%5.83%6.86%5.93%

Financials

GSK vs. GRP.IR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Greencoat Renewables PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GSK values in GBP, GRP.IR values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


GSK and GRP.IR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSK and GRP.IR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer