GSIT vs. AMAT
GSIT (GSI Technology, Inc.) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GSIT in Semiconductors, AMAT in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, GSIT returned 6.42%/yr vs 40.85%/yr for AMAT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSIT vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIT achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 149.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIT has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 6.42%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 40.85% annualized return.
GSIT
- 1D
- -2.90%
- 1M
- -23.81%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- 1Y
- 138.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
AMAT
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 48.13%
- YTD
- 149.73%
- 6M
- 147.78%
- 1Y
- 280.55%
- 3Y*
- 68.94%
- 5Y*
- 37.57%
- 10Y*
- 40.85%
GSIT vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIT GSI Technology, Inc. | 18.52% | 104.95% | 14.77% | 52.60% | -62.63% | -37.43% | 4.37% | 37.94% | -35.43% | 28.39% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 149.73% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIT and AMAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GSIT and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GSIT:
-$0.16
AMAT:
$10.61
GSIT:
6.67
AMAT:
17.68
GSIT:
$25.12M
AMAT:
$29.02B
GSIT:
$13.70M
AMAT:
$14.21B
GSIT:
-$13.79M
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIT vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
GSIT
AMAT
GSIT vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIT | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.67 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 13.22 | -11.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 37.71 | -34.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIT vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIT drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIT and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIT | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.53% | -85.22% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.07% | -21.37% | -41.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.69% | -49.88% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.39% | -55.14% | -25.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.47% | -55.14% | -29.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.25% | 0.00% | -43.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -38.76% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.42% | 7.48% | +31.94% |
Volatility
GSIT vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) has a higher volatility of 28.99% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 19.60%. This indicates that GSIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIT | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.99% | 19.60% | +9.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.69% | 38.81% | +50.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.30% | 49.40% | +145.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.38% | 44.33% | +107.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.04% | 43.04% | +69.00% |
Dividends
GSIT vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
GSIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
GSIT GSI Technology, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GSIT vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GSI Technology, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GSIT vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
GSIT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GSI Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.31M and revenue of 6.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
GSIT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GSI Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.21M and revenue of 6.32M, resulting in an operating margin of -82.4%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
GSIT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GSI Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 4.82M and revenue of 6.32M, resulting in a net margin of 76.3%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIT and AMAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIT has higher volatility (28.99%) compared to AMAT (19.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIT dropped -85.53% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.73 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIT and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer