PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIPX vs. RRPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund (GSIPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIPX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than RRPAX's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIPX has underperformed RRPAX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while RRPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.98% annualized return.


GSIPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.12%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.92%

RRPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIPX
Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund
1.48%6.15%1.87%3.70%-16.63%5.39%10.31%8.33%-1.50%2.78%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
1.97%6.53%4.54%3.49%-4.06%5.41%5.64%5.01%0.31%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIPX and RRPAX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.77

The correlation between GSIPX and RRPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIPX vs. RRPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIPX
GSIPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GSIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RRPAX
RRPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RRPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RRPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund (GSIPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIPXRRPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.55

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

5.40

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

20.03

-12.45

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the RRPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIPX and RRPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIPXRRPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.50

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.92

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.11

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIPX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than RRPAX's maximum drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIPX and RRPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIPXRRPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-16.15%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

-0.85%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.52%

-1.89%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-6.48%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.83%

-6.48%

-12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-0.11%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-2.95%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.23%

+0.44%

Volatility

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund (GSIPX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund (RRPAX) at 0.58%. This indicates that GSIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIPXRRPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.58%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

1.32%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

1.84%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

3.24%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

2.70%

+3.01%

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIPX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than RRPAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIPX vs. RRPAX - Dividend Comparison

GSIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than RRPAX's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIPX
Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund
3.97%3.58%4.57%3.84%1.37%5.27%1.15%2.44%2.11%1.98%1.27%0.76%
RRPAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Real Return Fund
3.92%4.64%3.57%2.43%7.18%5.33%1.38%2.14%2.35%1.89%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIPX and RRPAX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIPX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to RRPAX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIPX dropped -18.83% vs RRPAX's -16.15%.

RRPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIPX and RRPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer