GSIPX vs. FIPDX
GSIPX (Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund) and FIPDX (Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, GSIPX returned 1.77%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for FIPDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSIPX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FIPDX.
Performance
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIPX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIPX has underperformed FIPDX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while FIPDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.
GSIPX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
FIPDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIPX Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 0.54% | 6.15% | 1.87% | 3.70% | -16.63% | 5.39% | 10.31% | 8.33% | -1.50% | 2.78% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.78% | 6.90% | 2.00% | 3.77% | -12.09% | 5.94% | 10.90% | 8.32% | -1.37% | 2.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIPX and FIPDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GSIPX and FIPDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIPX vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank
GSIPX
FIPDX
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund (GSIPX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIPX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.89 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 5.46 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIPX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIPX and FIPDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIPX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -14.32% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -1.94% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.52% | -4.49% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.83% | -14.32% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.83% | -14.32% | -4.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -0.97% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -4.46% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.67% | +0.01% |
Volatility
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund (GSIPX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 1.13%. This indicates that GSIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIPX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.13% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.42% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 3.36% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 5.97% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 5.37% | +0.35% |
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIPX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIPX vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison
GSIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FIPDX's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 1.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
GSIPX Goldman Sachs Inflation Protected Securities Fund | 4.01% | 3.58% | 4.57% | 3.84% | 1.37% | 5.27% | 1.15% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 1.98% | 1.27% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GSIPX and FIPDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSIPX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FIPDX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIPX dropped -18.83% vs FIPDX's -14.32%.
FIPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIPX and FIPDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer