PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIOX vs. RYWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund (GSIOX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIOX achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than RYWCX's 16.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIOX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


GSIOX

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.23%
YTD
20.18%
6M
21.91%
1Y
46.81%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.95%

RYWCX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
16.78%
6M
16.98%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIOX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund
20.18%16.99%22.37%21.29%-27.09%9.87%18.35%26.50%-7.15%18.41%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
16.78%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIOX and RYWCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.95

The correlation between GSIOX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIOX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIOX
GSIOX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GSIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund (GSIOX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIOXRYWCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

1.60

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

2.40

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.43

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.53

11.24

+2.29

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIOX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIOXRYWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.60

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.09

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.29

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.26

+0.14

Drawdowns

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIOX drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIOX and RYWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIOXRYWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-60.64%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-8.49%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.21%

-26.39%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.12%

-40.28%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

-54.65%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.00%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-13.45%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.59%

+0.96%

Volatility

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund (GSIOX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) at 4.68%. This indicates that GSIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIOXRYWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

4.68%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

13.34%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

18.33%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

22.87%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

24.72%

-0.11%

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIOX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIOX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

GSIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIOX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund
4.10%4.93%0.80%0.00%0.39%113.92%2.94%1.11%10.85%3.67%0.00%8.38%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GSIOX and RYWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSIOX has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to RYWCX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIOX dropped -53.27% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

GSIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIOX and RYWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer