GSIMX vs. CRDBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) and CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) are both mutual funds - GSIMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while CRDBX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. Over the past 5 years, GSIMX returned 8.60%/yr vs 15.60%/yr for CRDBX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSIMX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for CRDBX.

Performance

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIMX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 17.37% return.

GSIMX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 7.01%
• 1Y: 11.66%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: —

CRDBX

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 17.37%
• 6M: 16.82%
• 1Y: 41.09%
• 3Y*: 19.49%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	5.38%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	13.56%
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	17.37%	25.36%	19.91%	18.44%	-8.21%	28.08%	24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIMX and CRDBX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020	0.39

The correlation between GSIMX and CRDBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSIMX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 18
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

CRDBX

CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 90
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSIMX	CRDBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.90	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	4.11	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.67	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	5.78	-4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	18.99	-14.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIMX and CRDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSIMX	CRDBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	2.90	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.83	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.08	-0.27

Drawdowns

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIMX drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, roughly equal to the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIMX and CRDBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIMX	CRDBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.84%	-28.12%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-7.13%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.32%	-17.77%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.37%	-28.12%	+2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.67%	-1.19%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-6.58%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.16%	+0.19%

Volatility

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) is 2.93%, while Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that GSIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIMX	CRDBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	4.31%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	10.84%	-2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.69%	14.20%	-4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	19.73%	-5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	20.36%	-4.67%

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSIMX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than CRDBX's 13.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund	13.09%	15.36%	12.58%	9.91%	0.18%	25.05%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.86%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIMX and CRDBX in my portfolio?

GSIMX and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSIMX or CRDBX?

CRDBX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to GSIMX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIMX dropped -28.84% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.