PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIFX vs. GSAKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than GSAKX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has underperformed GSAKX with an annualized return of 9.42%, while GSAKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


GSIFX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.77%
YTD
6.83%
6M
9.07%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.42%

GSAKX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.59%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.83%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
10.59%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIFX and GSAKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.96

The correlation between GSIFX and GSAKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIFX vs. GSAKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIFXGSAKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.31

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

8.27

-4.03

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GSAKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIFX and GSAKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIFXGSAKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.80

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.81

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Drawdowns

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GSAKX drawdown of -56.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and GSAKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIFXGSAKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.25%

-56.96%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-11.31%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-12.18%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-26.02%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-34.49%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.45%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-12.28%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.14%

+0.04%

Volatility

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIFXGSAKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.83%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

11.72%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

14.55%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.70%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

16.14%

+1.26%

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GSAKX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIFX vs. GSAKX - Dividend Comparison

GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than GSAKX's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.39%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.04%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GSIFX and GSAKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to GSAKX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIFX dropped -59.25% vs GSAKX's -56.96%.

GSAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIFX and GSAKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer