PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGO vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGO vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 36.69% return.


GSGO

1D
1.78%
1M
-2.59%
6M
7.57%
YTD
6.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DRLL

1D
0.80%
1M
14.19%
6M
21.14%
YTD
36.69%
1Y
44.82%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$463.62K$500.96K$563.89K
$292.33K$361.30K$297.31K

GSGO vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
6.78%0.81%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
36.69%-3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGO and DRLL is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGO vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSGO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSGO vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSGODRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

GSGO vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSGO vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGODRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-23.73%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-4.30%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-8.14%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

Volatility

GSGO vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGODRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

23.03%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

23.80%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

23.80%

-4.11%

GSGO vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGO vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.22%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGO and DRLL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.

GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.41% for DRLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGO and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer