GSGO vs. DRLL
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. GSGO is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
GSGO vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 36.69% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DRLL
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 21.14%
- YTD
- 36.69%
- 1Y
- 44.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $463.62K | $500.96K | $563.89K | |
| $292.33K | $361.30K | $297.31K |
GSGO vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 6.78% | 0.81% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 36.69% | -3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and DRLL is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRLL
GSGO vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -23.73% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -4.30% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -8.14% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.68% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 23.03% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 23.80% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 23.80% | -4.11% |
GSGO vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.22% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% |
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and DRLL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.41% for DRLL.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer