PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGDX vs. VLTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than VLTCX's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has outperformed VLTCX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while VLTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.


GSGDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.79%

VLTCX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.45%
1Y
8.33%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.53%8.23%1.93%8.81%-17.33%-0.97%10.12%16.83%-2.55%6.49%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.12%7.27%-1.47%11.05%-25.77%-1.16%13.68%23.19%-6.85%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGDX and VLTCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.89

The correlation between GSGDX and VLTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGDX vs. VLTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGDX
GSGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GSGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VLTCX
VLTCX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VLTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VLTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGDXVLTCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.01

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

1.49

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.50

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

3.70

+3.30

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the VLTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGDX and VLTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGDXVLTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.01

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.13

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Drawdowns

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum VLTCX drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and VLTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGDXVLTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-34.56%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-5.29%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-12.87%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-34.56%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.48%

-34.56%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-13.88%

+12.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-8.04%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.15%

-1.12%

Volatility

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) is 1.58%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that GSGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGDXVLTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

2.48%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

5.53%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

7.69%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

11.87%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

10.61%

-4.20%

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VLTCX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGDX vs. VLTCX - Dividend Comparison

GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than VLTCX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.83%4.75%3.94%3.52%2.74%5.10%4.18%5.89%3.56%3.19%3.38%3.76%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.51%5.48%5.58%4.65%4.41%3.03%3.15%3.82%4.56%4.01%4.37%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGDX and VLTCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLTCX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to GSGDX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGDX dropped -23.48% vs VLTCX's -34.56%.

GSGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGDX and VLTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer