PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGDX vs. GSRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than GSRAX's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has underperformed GSRAX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while GSRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.


GSGDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.79%

GSRAX

1D
0.86%
1M
2.73%
YTD
10.57%
6M
11.26%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.53%8.23%1.93%8.81%-17.33%-0.97%10.12%16.83%-2.55%6.49%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
10.57%6.66%26.07%17.49%-7.78%31.47%8.75%25.63%-6.65%17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGDX and GSRAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

-0.08

The correlation between GSGDX and GSRAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGDX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGDX
GSGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GSGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GSRAX
GSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGDXGSRAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.66

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

2.38

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.57

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

9.69

-2.69

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the GSRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGDX and GSRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGDXGSRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.66

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.60

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.63

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Drawdowns

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum GSRAX drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and GSRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGDXGSRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-44.40%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-7.32%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-25.43%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-25.43%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.48%

-38.97%

+15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

0.00%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-6.07%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.94%

-0.91%

Volatility

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) is 1.58%, while Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that GSGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGDXGSRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

2.86%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

8.31%

-4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

11.51%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

20.21%

-13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

19.87%

-13.46%

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GSRAX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGDX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison

GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than GSRAX's 11.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.83%4.75%3.94%3.52%2.74%5.10%4.18%5.89%3.56%3.19%3.38%3.76%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
11.44%12.17%25.88%9.60%14.01%11.55%4.39%11.85%97.89%21.56%3.16%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGDX and GSRAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSRAX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to GSGDX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGDX dropped -23.48% vs GSRAX's -44.40%.

GSRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGDX and GSRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer