PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSG vs. PDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSG vs. PDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 38.94% return, which is significantly higher than PDP's 14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GSG has underperformed PDP with an annualized return of 8.91%, while PDP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


GSG

1D
0.28%
1M
12.94%
6M
25.75%
YTD
38.94%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
-2.13%

PDP

1D
0.32%
1M
-9.12%
6M
9.33%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
12.35%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.60M$17.31M$26.52M
$3.96M$3.45M$3.85M

GSG vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
38.94%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
14.75%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GSG and PDP is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.29

The correlation between GSG and PDP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSG vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSG vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSGPDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.03

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

4.02

+2.97

GSG vs. PDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the PDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSG and PDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSG vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than PDP's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and PDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.62%

-59.34%

-30.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-17.58%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-23.79%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-33.91%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

-34.70%

-22.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.05%

-12.80%

-45.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-10.57%

-53.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

4.51%

+1.33%

Volatility

GSG vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) is 8.11%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that GSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

11.41%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

21.23%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.23%

25.85%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

22.80%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

22.01%

+0.05%

GSG vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSG vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison

GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.08%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSG and PDP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to GSG (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSG dropped -89.62% vs PDP's -59.34%.

On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 12.35% vs 8.91% for GSG. On fees, PDP is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDP is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

PDP has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

GSG is categorized as Commodities, while PDP is Momentum. GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index, while PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSG and 0.62% for PDP.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSG and PDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer