GSG vs. COMB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB).
GSG and COMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017.
Performance
GSG vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSG vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 39.85% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 10.37% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.42% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 39.85% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 24.42% return.
GSG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- YTD
- 39.85%
- 6M
- 40.40%
- 1Y
- 41.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
COMB
GSG vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 1.85 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 2.44 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.57 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 9.81 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.85 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.52 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and COMB is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSG vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.27% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
GSG vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and COMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -33.50% | -56.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -9.19% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -26.63% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.78% | 0.00% | -57.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -12.25% | -51.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 3.34% | +0.93% |
Volatility
GSG vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 7.51%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 7.51% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 13.80% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 17.18% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 16.53% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 15.05% | +6.73% |