GSG vs. COMB
GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. GSG is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSG returned 15.74%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for COMB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
GSG vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 42.58% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 26.81% return.
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
GSG vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 10.37% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and COMB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GSG and COMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
COMB
GSG vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 5.08 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | 13.24 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.29 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.52 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
GSG vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -33.50% | -56.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -7.69% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.94% | -11.35% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -26.63% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.95% | -4.35% | -52.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.71% | -12.06% | -51.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.94% | +0.65% |
Volatility
GSG vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 5.14%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 5.14% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 14.99% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 17.02% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 16.70% | +5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 15.13% | +6.90% |
GSG vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSG vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSG and COMB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to COMB (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSG dropped -89.62% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 15.74% vs 11.27% for COMB. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMB has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 15.74% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSG and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSG and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer