GSG vs. AMPS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L).
GSG and AMPS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. AMPS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. Both GSG and AMPS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 39.85% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | -7.09% |
AMPS.L WisdomTree Battery Metals | 4.64% | 17.34% | -0.96% | -24.30% | -1.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
GSG is traded in USD, while AMPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 39.85% return, which is significantly higher than AMPS.L's 4.64% return.
GSG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- YTD
- 39.85%
- 6M
- 40.40%
- 1Y
- 41.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
AMPS.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 15.87%
- 3Y*
- 1.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AMPS.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. AMPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
AMPS.L
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 0.91 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 1.28 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 1.58 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 3.94 | +6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.91 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.11 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and AMPS.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSG nor AMPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than AMPS.L's maximum drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and AMPS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -35.07% | -54.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -9.81% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.78% | -18.31% | -39.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -24.09% | -39.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 4.70% | -0.43% |
Volatility
GSG vs. AMPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) at 4.77%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | AMPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 4.77% | +6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 12.25% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 17.39% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.85% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 21.85% | -0.07% |