PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSFIX vs. GSRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSFIX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than GSRAX's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GSFIX has underperformed GSRAX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while GSRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


GSFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
1.83%

GSRAX

1D
0.94%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.17%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSFIX
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund
0.19%7.70%0.81%5.98%-14.72%-1.75%9.92%10.60%-0.51%3.46%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
11.61%6.66%26.07%17.49%-7.78%31.47%8.75%25.63%-6.65%17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GSFIX and GSRAX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

-0.11

The correlation between GSFIX and GSRAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSFIX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSFIX
GSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GSRAX
GSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSFIXGSRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.74

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

10.31

-5.02

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GSRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSFIX and GSRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSFIXGSRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.74

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.62

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.64

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.49

+0.37

Drawdowns

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, smaller than the maximum GSRAX drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFIX and GSRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSFIXGSRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-44.40%

+22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-7.32%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.86%

-25.43%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-25.43%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.73%

-38.97%

+17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

0.00%

-5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-6.07%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.94%

-0.86%

Volatility

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) is 1.39%, while Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that GSFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSFIXGSRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

2.85%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

8.33%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

11.52%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

20.21%

-13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

19.87%

-14.40%

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSFIX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GSRAX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSFIX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison

GSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than GSRAX's 11.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSFIX
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund
4.14%4.10%3.57%3.44%2.17%1.94%4.56%4.40%2.78%2.54%2.58%2.49%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
11.34%12.17%25.88%9.60%14.01%11.55%4.39%11.85%97.89%21.56%3.16%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSFIX and GSRAX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSRAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to GSFIX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSFIX dropped -21.73% vs GSRAX's -44.40%.

GSRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSFIX and GSRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer