GSEU vs. FSZ
GSEU (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF) and FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - GSEU tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index while FSZ tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSEU returned 10.17%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for FSZ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FSZ.
Performance
GSEU vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 2.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSEU having a 10.17% annualized return and FSZ not far ahead at 10.25%.
GSEU
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
FSZ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
GSEU vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 6.37% | 35.70% | 2.00% | 20.74% | -17.90% | 17.33% | 6.64% | 24.57% | -14.29% | 26.97% |
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 30.10% | -1.85% | 21.30% | -20.12% | 20.18% | 13.83% | 25.88% | -15.22% | 31.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEU and FSZ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GSEU and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEU vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEU
FSZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSEU
FSZ
Industrials
GSEU
FSZ
Healthcare
GSEU
FSZ
Technology
GSEU
FSZ
Consumer Defensive
GSEU
FSZ
Consumer Cyclical
GSEU
FSZ
Basic Materials
GSEU
FSZ
Utilities
GSEU
FSZ
Energy
GSEU
FSZ
-
Communication Services
GSEU
FSZ
Real Estate
GSEU
FSZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEU vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank
GSEU
FSZ
GSEU vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEU | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.07 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 2.61 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEU vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and FSZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEU | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.71% | -33.97% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -10.39% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.12% | -13.93% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.98% | -33.96% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.71% | -33.97% | -1.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -4.66% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -6.98% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 4.24% | -1.08% |
Volatility
GSEU vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) at 4.07%. This indicates that GSEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEU | FSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.07% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 11.05% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 14.34% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 19.35% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 18.75% | -0.98% |
GSEU vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEU vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison
GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than FSZ's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund | 2.38% | 1.80% | 1.80% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 1.62% | 1.53% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 1.49% | 1.93% | 1.08% |
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 3.41% | 3.34% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 3.69% | 3.40% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEU and FSZ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEU has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs FSZ's -33.97%.
On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 10.25% vs 10.17% for GSEU. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.
GSEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.38% for FSZ.
GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.80% for FSZ.
GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEU and FSZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer