PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEP vs. FSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSEP vs. FSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSEP vs. FSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September
-1.34%10.56%10.85%4.70%
FSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
-2.03%12.83%13.56%5.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEP achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly higher than FSEP's -2.03% return.


GSEP

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
0.17%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSEP

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSEP vs. FSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSEP and FSEP have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

GSEP vs. FSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEP
GSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEP vs. FSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEPFSEPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.61

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.64

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.05

8.27

-0.22

GSEP vs. FSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the FSEP Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEP and FSEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEPFSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.96

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between GSEP and FSEP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSEP vs. FSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSEP nor FSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GSEP vs. FSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEP drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum FSEP drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEP and FSEP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEPFSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-13.79%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-8.16%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-3.25%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-2.19%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.62%

-0.29%

Volatility

GSEP vs. FSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) is 3.16%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that GSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSEPFSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.74%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

6.14%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

12.12%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.73%

10.75%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

10.64%

-2.91%