GSCYX vs. FTHSX
GSCYX (GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund) and FTHSX (FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX returned 10.13%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for FTHSX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSCYX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FTHSX.
Performance
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than FTHSX's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed FTHSX with an annualized return of 10.13%, while FTHSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
GSCYX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
FTHSX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund | 17.66% | 6.03% | 10.58% | 14.91% | -17.84% | 22.04% | 20.07% | 25.28% | -12.62% | 13.12% |
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 14.27% | 12.02% | 16.17% | 22.55% | -7.49% | 30.83% | 10.38% | 28.06% | -13.18% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCYX and FTHSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015 | 0.94 |
The correlation between GSCYX and FTHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSCYX vs. FTHSX — Risk / Return Rank
GSCYX
FTHSX
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSCYX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.58 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 9.25 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than FTHSX's maximum drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and FTHSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCYX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.53% | -37.74% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -9.42% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.51% | -24.58% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | -24.58% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.83% | -37.74% | -3.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.19% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.09% | -5.59% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.63% | +0.36% |
Volatility
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX) at 3.05%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSCYX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.05% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 10.94% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 15.14% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 18.85% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 20.07% | +3.21% |
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHSX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSCYX vs. FTHSX - Dividend Comparison
GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than FTHSX's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 0.48% | 0.54% | 8.05% | 1.81% | 1.23% | 3.77% | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 15.40% |
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund | 9.61% | 11.30% | 6.14% | 2.65% | 5.13% | 16.30% | 1.07% | 3.87% | 24.79% | 7.81% | 1.46% | 6.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSCYX and FTHSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSCYX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to FTHSX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs FTHSX's -37.74%.
FTHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSCYX and FTHSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer