PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCYX vs. AUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than AUERX's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


GSCYX

1D
1.61%
1M
2.85%
6M
12.83%
YTD
18.72%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
10.36%

AUERX

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.26%
6M
12.88%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
37.04%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
20.24%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
18.72%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%13.12%
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
13.39%30.10%11.12%21.42%9.95%45.11%-1.85%27.96%-25.63%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and AUERX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2007

0.85

The correlation between GSCYX and AUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AUERX
AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSCYXAUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.79

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

15.08

-6.19

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, smaller than the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and AUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCYXAUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-67.23%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-10.06%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-34.80%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-34.80%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-51.89%

+11.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-3.49%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-24.76%

+9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.53%

+0.46%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) at 4.46%. This indicates that GSCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCYXAUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

4.46%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

12.51%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

16.67%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

24.82%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

24.34%

-1.06%

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSCYX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, less than AUERX's 10.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
10.04%11.39%24.55%4.54%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.52%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSCYX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSCYX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to AUERX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSCYX and AUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer