GSCMX vs. MZLSX
GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) and MZLSX (Muzinich Low Duration Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GSCMX returned 3.01%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for MZLSX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSCMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MZLSX.
Performance
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than MZLSX's 1.32% return.
GSCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
MZLSX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund | 0.69% | 8.70% | 6.13% | 10.60% | -10.75% | 0.42% | 9.24% | 1.17% |
MZLSX Muzinich Low Duration Fund | 1.32% | 6.38% | 6.30% | 7.63% | -3.41% | 2.50% | 2.64% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCMX and MZLSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between GSCMX and MZLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSCMX vs. MZLSX — Risk / Return Rank
GSCMX
MZLSX
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSCMX | MZLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.88 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.41 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 15.45 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSCMX | MZLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 3.32 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 2.31 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.75 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than MZLSX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and MZLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCMX | MZLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -12.66% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -1.50% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.24% | -1.50% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.20% | -6.09% | -12.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -0.85% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.33% | +0.30% |
Volatility
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) at 0.58%. This indicates that GSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MZLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSCMX | MZLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 0.58% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 1.35% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 1.55% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 1.62% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 2.13% | +3.66% |
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MZLSX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSCMX vs. MZLSX - Dividend Comparison
GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than MZLSX's 7.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund | 5.09% | 5.09% | 5.39% | 4.71% | 8.43% | 3.51% | 3.95% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MZLSX Muzinich Low Duration Fund | 7.23% | 7.03% | 4.77% | 4.88% | 3.85% | 6.36% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 8.62% | 1.86% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSCMX and MZLSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSCMX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to MZLSX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCMX dropped -20.12% vs MZLSX's -12.66%.
MZLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSCMX and MZLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer