GSCMX vs. ESIIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) and ESIIX (Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GSCMX returned 3.01%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for ESIIX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSCMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ESIIX.

Performance

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than ESIIX's 2.18% return.

GSCMX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: —

ESIIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	0.69%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.42%	9.24%	1.17%
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	2.18%	12.46%	6.66%	8.52%	-2.32%	1.59%	7.80%	-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCMX and ESIIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.55

Over the past year, GSCMX and ESIIX have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GSCMX vs. ESIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 48
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ESIIX

ESIIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
ESIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ESIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ESIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCMX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	3.61	-1.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	5.41	-2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.83	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	4.21	-1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.98	16.21	-5.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the ESIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCMX and ESIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCMX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	3.61	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	1.67	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.46	+0.20

Drawdowns

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum ESIIX drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and ESIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCMX	ESIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-26.87%	+6.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-2.44%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	-2.46%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.20%	-6.18%	-12.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-12.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.55%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-4.72%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.63%	0.00%

Volatility

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) at 1.05%. This indicates that GSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCMX	ESIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	1.05%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	2.23%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18%	2.84%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	3.19%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.79%	3.17%	+2.62%

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIIX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSCMX vs. ESIIX - Dividend Comparison

GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than ESIIX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	7.39%	7.01%	7.23%	7.19%	5.82%	4.57%	4.44%	5.29%	4.25%	3.95%	4.18%	4.59%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	5.09%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSCMX and ESIIX in my portfolio?

GSCMX and ESIIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSCMX or ESIIX?

GSCMX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to ESIIX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCMX dropped -20.12% vs ESIIX's -26.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.