PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCGX vs. PAGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSCGX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund
-4.98%15.70%38.33%26.49%-19.82%24.47%22.78%32.33%-2.82%30.62%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
-0.34%36.58%44.15%38.39%-26.25%24.53%37.32%40.01%-12.62%19.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCGX achieves a -4.98% return, which is significantly lower than PAGDX's -0.34% return.


GSCGX

1D
3.06%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-4.98%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
15.15%

PAGDX

1D
3.72%
1M
-5.55%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
4.17%
1Y
43.60%
3Y*
35.31%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGDX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSCGX vs. PAGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCGX
GSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGDX
PAGDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PAGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCGXPAGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.73

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

2.47

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.19

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.31

16.11

-10.81

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the PAGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCGX and PAGDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCGXPAGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.73

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.76

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between GSCGX and PAGDX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Dividend Comparison

GSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than PAGDX's 0.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSCGX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund
12.75%12.12%25.42%0.46%8.75%10.68%3.70%4.03%49.12%8.67%1.45%8.72%
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
0.03%0.03%5.48%2.59%7.53%6.80%14.94%16.97%12.25%8.50%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCGX drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than PAGDX's maximum drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCGX and PAGDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCGXPAGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-38.03%

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-13.80%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.00%

-36.66%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-5.78%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.04%

-7.46%

-3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.73%

-0.06%

Volatility

GSCGX vs. PAGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) is 5.69%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that GSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSCGXPAGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

6.78%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

13.91%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

25.70%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

24.53%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

25.10%

-4.43%