GSCGX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GSCGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 20, 1990. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
GSCGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSCGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | -4.98% | 15.70% | 38.33% | 26.49% | -19.82% | 24.47% | 22.78% | 32.33% | -2.82% | 31.84% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCGX achieves a -4.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCGX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 15.15%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.
GSCGX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSCGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSCGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GSCGX
VOO
GSCGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.01 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.53 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.55 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 7.31 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.01 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.79 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.83 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCGX and VOO is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSCGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | 12.75% | 12.12% | 25.42% | 0.46% | 8.75% | 10.68% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 49.12% | 8.67% | 1.45% | 8.72% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GSCGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCGX drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCGX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -33.99% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -11.98% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -24.52% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | -33.99% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -5.55% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -3.72% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.55% | +0.12% |
Volatility
GSCGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that GSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.34% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 9.47% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 18.11% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 16.82% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 17.99% | +2.68% |