PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAGDX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGDX achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 6.99% return.


PAGDX

1D
2.24%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.21%
6M
20.74%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
40.60%
5Y*
19.34%
10Y*

PRPFX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.45%
YTD
6.99%
6M
10.01%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
16.21%36.58%44.15%38.39%-26.25%24.53%37.32%40.01%-12.62%19.29%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
6.99%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PAGDX and PRPFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.73

The correlation between PAGDX and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAGDX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGDX
PAGDX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PAGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAGDXPRPFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.03

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

2.48

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

3.06

+2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.83

8.59

+13.24

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGDX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAGDXPRPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.03

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.04

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.80

+0.02

Drawdowns

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGDX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAGDXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-27.16%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.10%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-8.19%

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.66%

-15.49%

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.29%

+4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-3.52%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.89%

-0.75%

Volatility

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A (PAGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 2.70%. This indicates that PAGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAGDXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

2.70%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

11.23%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

12.50%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

11.06%

+13.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.97%

10.62%

+14.35%

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGDX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAGDX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

PAGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than PRPFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAGDX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
0.03%0.03%5.48%2.59%7.53%6.80%14.94%16.97%12.25%8.50%0.00%0.00%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
3.05%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAGDX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAGDX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to PRPFX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGDX dropped -38.03% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

PAGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAGDX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer