PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSC vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.


GSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.86%
6M
14.87%
YTD
22.25%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
28.58%
5Y*
22.84%
10Y*
11.78%

SMST

1D
5.26%
1M
44.38%
6M
-15.07%
YTD
-27.96%
1Y
240.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
22.25%6.29%1.55%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-27.96%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and SMST is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSCSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.30

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.83

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

5.47

-3.67

GSC vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSC vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-99.25%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-85.39%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.39%

-97.17%

+69.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-90.89%

+31.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.92%

44.09%

-27.17%

Volatility

GSC vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) is 6.37%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that GSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

56.59%

-50.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.43%

135.88%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

404.63%

149.23%

+255.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.83%

167.74%

+51.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.44%

167.74%

-7.30%

GSC vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSC vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.13%0.16%0.66%0.11%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSC and SMST have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to GSC (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs 30.42% for GSC. On fees, GSC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GSC has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs 30.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

GSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSC and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer