GSBC vs. BHF
GSBC (Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.) and BHF (Brighthouse Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — GSBC in Banks - Regional, BHF in Insurance - Life. Over the past 5 years, GSBC returned 7.54%/yr vs 5.10%/yr for BHF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GSBC vs. BHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSBC achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than BHF's -3.69% return.
GSBC
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
BHF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -3.69%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GSBC vs. BHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSBC Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. | 16.20% | 6.01% | 3.48% | 2.84% | 3.10% | 24.23% | -18.75% | 42.74% | -8.78% | -1.48% |
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | -3.69% | 34.87% | -9.22% | 3.22% | -1.02% | 43.07% | -7.71% | 28.71% | -48.02% | -16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSBC and BHF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GSBC and BHF has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GSBC:
$8.34
BHF:
-$1.50
GSBC:
2.36
BHF:
0.48
GSBC:
$256.82M
BHF:
$5.58B
GSBC:
$173.84M
BHF:
$2.23B
GSBC:
$70.00M
BHF:
$942.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSBC vs. BHF — Risk / Return Rank
GSBC
BHF
GSBC vs. BHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) and Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSBC | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.21 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 0.47 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSBC | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.10 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.12 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | -0.03 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
GSBC vs. BHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSBC drawdown since its inception was -81.56%, which is greater than BHF's maximum drawdown of -76.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBC and BHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSBC | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.56% | -76.93% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -26.89% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.43% | -31.14% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | -35.19% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -10.86% | +8.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -33.00% | +16.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 11.82% | -6.13% |
Volatility
GSBC vs. BHF - Volatility Comparison
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) at 2.81%. This indicates that GSBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSBC | BHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 2.81% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 7.01% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.22% | 54.01% | -26.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 43.41% | -16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 48.83% | -19.00% |
Dividends
GSBC vs. BHF - Dividend Comparison
GSBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSBC Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. | 2.38% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.70% | 2.62% | 2.36% | 4.83% | 3.27% | 2.61% | 1.82% | 1.61% | 1.90% |
Financials
GSBC vs. BHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. and Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GSBC and BHF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to BHF (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBC dropped -81.56% vs BHF's -76.93%.
GSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSBC and BHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer