PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. MDDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares (MDDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than MDDVX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed MDDVX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while MDDVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.


GSAKX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.59%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.54%

MDDVX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.67%
YTD
9.51%
6M
11.85%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
10.59%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%
MDDVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares
9.51%21.43%6.78%12.39%-4.17%19.86%3.74%27.30%-7.42%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and MDDVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.81

The correlation between GSAKX and MDDVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. MDDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MDDVX
MDDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MDDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MDDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares (MDDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAKXMDDVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.33

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

3.28

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.87

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.27

12.09

-3.82

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MDDVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and MDDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAKXMDDVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.33

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.63

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.69

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than MDDVX's maximum drawdown of -50.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and MDDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXMDDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-50.22%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-9.02%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-15.26%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-18.18%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

-35.93%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-5.93%

-6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.14%

+1.00%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares (MDDVX) at 2.90%. This indicates that GSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXMDDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

2.90%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

8.69%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

11.10%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

14.22%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.32%

-0.18%

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MDDVX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. MDDVX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than MDDVX's 9.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.39%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%
MDDVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares
9.21%10.06%8.38%6.89%13.29%11.93%6.15%12.95%13.77%14.20%7.79%18.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSAKX and MDDVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSAKX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to MDDVX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs MDDVX's -50.22%.

MDDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAKX and MDDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer